Dxo optics pro vs capture one
![dxo optics pro vs capture one dxo optics pro vs capture one](https://www.popphoto.com/uploads/2019/01/17/6RALEQJ24ILMEKF7TCCYATRDSQ.jpg)
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one how to#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one skin#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one software#
- #Dxo optics pro vs capture one license#
So both software packages show advantages. It's included in Capture One Pro and called Keystone Correction. Perspective correction seems to be offered by the extra component DXO Viewpoint. You have to go via tiff 16 bit to get the most out of your files. Silver Effex Pro would be the great counterpart but costs extra and as far as I can see is not raw based. By examle advanced Black & White editing I do very often with great results. In addition Capture One Pro offers some functionality that isn't available in DXO Photolab or I'd have to pay for an additional component. In this area it's a lot more capable than DXO Photolab IMO and by working with xmp-sidecar files Metadata can be shared for both applications - if I'd need this. Photo organisation stays fully Capture One Pro based.
![dxo optics pro vs capture one dxo optics pro vs capture one](https://i2.wp.com/www.lifeafterphotoshop.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/exportsharpen-02.jpg)
Since my work is Capture One Session based they harmonize very well.
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one license#
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one skin#
CaptureOne, especially for skin tones, does detail, saturation, and color balance adjustments better than Optics Pro. I would recommend that you restrict your edits to exposure (with the knowledge that it impacts noise reduction), noise reduction, and lens/sensor corrections (chromatic aberration, dust, distortion, and if you have Viewpoint, perspective and volume deformation).
![dxo optics pro vs capture one dxo optics pro vs capture one](https://2.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~TS590x0~articles/4557201408/capture-one-express-fujifilm-ui-customization.jpeg)
You are going to apply your edits to the RAW image and then overwrite the TIFF that CaptureOne just generated. Optics Pro should open with the new TIFF selected. You should be returned to the EDITING OPTIONS dialogue. Once you have the executable selected, click Open.
![dxo optics pro vs capture one dxo optics pro vs capture one](https://www.behindtheshutter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/SM_Blog_DLucas-Large.jpg)
#Dxo optics pro vs capture one how to#
So how to integrate Optics Pro into the CaptureOne workflow? Prior to CaptureOne v8.1, it wasn’t any fun, and it’s still not exactly straight-forward – but it’s very doable. In my (unscientific) testing, however, DxO’s Optics Pro is superior for lens aberration correction and is far superior for noise reduction (in fact, in my opinion, Optics Pro is the best noise reduction software on the market today). I’ve come to a point where I’m using it fairly exclusively in my workflow. Its library (digital asset) management, though not stellar, is adequate to the degree that’s it’s a fairly solid replacement for Lightroom. And so it is that I come to be in possession of licenses for both DxO‘s Optics Pro and PhaseOne‘s CaptureOne RAW processing software.ĬaptureOne software is one of the best RAW processors on the market today – and (remarkably), to an even greater degree than Lightroom, it eliminates the need for Photoshop in most situations. Those who know me know that I’ve been trying to eliminate Adobe products (specifically, Lightroom and Photoshop) from my photo processing workflow.